Hgj. Mesrobian et al., UNILATERAL RENAL AGENESIS MAY RESULT FROM IN-UTERO REGRESSION OF MULTICYSTIC RENAL DYSPLASIA, The Journal of urology, 150(2), 1993, pp. 793-794
Renal agenesis is generally thought to result from a lack of induction
of the metanephric blastema by the ureteral bud, which may be seconda
ry to ureteral bud maldevelopment and/or to a problem with the formati
on of the mesonephric duct. Multicystic dysplasia is thought to result
from early ureteral obstruction as evidenced by the high frequency of
associated proximal ureteral atresia. The recent obstetrical practice
of large scale screening of large numbers of fetuses with sonography
has resulted in a significant increase in the detection of this and ot
her genitourinary anomalies. These findings have contributed to our un
derstanding of the natural history of many of these malformations, res
ulting in ongoing reassessment and refinement of current management mo
dalities. Thus, it is now well established that a significant number o
f multicystic dysplastic kidneys, initially detected in utero and foll
owed postnatally, involute and disappear with time. We report the uneq
uivocal presence of unilateral multicystic dysplasia detected during m
aternal sonography in 3 fetuses, which could not be seen on subsequent
studies during the fetal or immediate postnatal period. To our knowle
dge, these cases constitute the first report of complete in utero regr
ession of multicystic kidneys. This novel observation indicates that s
ome cases of unilateral renal agenesis result from in utero regression
of multicystic dysplastic kidneys. This phenomenon may explain the pr
esence of an ipsilateral blind ending ureter found in some patients wi
th unilateral renal agenesis. However, this infrequent observation doe
s not explain all cases of renal agenesis. Thus, the etiology of renal
agenesis remains multifactorial.