Wb. White et al., 24-HOUR BLOOD-PRESSURE LOAD AS A SURROGATE END-POINT IN ASSESSING ANTIHYPERTENSIVE THERAPY, Journal of hypertension, 11, 1993, pp. 190000075-190000080
Aim: To examine the relationships among ambulatory blood pressure, blo
od pressure load (proportion of elevated blood pressure values over 24
-h recording) and indices of hypertensive heart disease (left ventricu
lar mass and left ventricular function) in untreated hypertensive pati
ents. A secondary aim was to evaluate the usefulness of ambulatory blo
od pressure load in assessing the long-term effects of antihypertensiv
e drug therapy. Methods: Data were obtained from a study of 15 men wit
h moderate to severe essential hypertension who had been treated with
a placebo followed by 6-8 months of carvedilol monotherapy (25-75 mg/d
ay). Blood pressure was evaluated by 24-h ambulatory monitoring. Resul
ts: In studies of office or 'white-coat' hypertensives, ambulatory blo
od pressure has proved a better predictor of target organ involvement
than casual (clinic) pressure. Blood pressure loads of >50% for systol
ic pressure and >40% for diastolic pressure are superior to clinic pre
ssures, and also to the usual ambulatory monitoring parameters of mean
24-h, awake and sleeping blood pressure, in predicting left ventricul
ar hypertrophy and abnormal diastolic performance. In the carvedilol s
tudy, the mean awake systolic blood pressure load fell from 94 to 43%
and the diastolic blood pressure load fell from 84 to 27% with carvedi
lol treatment (P<0.001 in both cases). Of the patients treated with ca
rvedilol monotherapy, 60% fell into the lower risk category (<50% syst
olic blood pressure and <40% diastolic blood pressure load). Conclusio
ns: These data support the use of blood pressure load in clinical stud
ies of mild to moderate essential hypertension as a measure of the eff
icacy of antihypertensive drugs.