WHAT WORD LEARNERS DO WHEN INPUT CONTRADICTS THE MUTUAL EXCLUSIVITY ASSUMPTION

Authors
Citation
Sl. Savage et Tkf. Au, WHAT WORD LEARNERS DO WHEN INPUT CONTRADICTS THE MUTUAL EXCLUSIVITY ASSUMPTION, Child development, 67(6), 1996, pp. 3120-3134
Citations number
28
Categorie Soggetti
Psychology, Educational","Psychology, Developmental
Journal title
ISSN journal
00093920
Volume
67
Issue
6
Year of publication
1996
Pages
3120 - 3134
Database
ISI
SICI code
0009-3920(1996)67:6<3120:WWLDWI>2.0.ZU;2-C
Abstract
In 4 studies, 3- to 5-year-olds beard 2 novel English labels each appl ied to the same novel object by a different adult. In all 4 studies, a bout half of the children accepted both labels, suggesting that hearin g 2 labels applied to an object offers strong enough evidence for some to override mutual exclusivity. Nonetheless, about half of the childr en honored mutual exclusivity and hence accepted only 1 label; they al so seemed to keep both labels in mind for at least a few minutes and s ettled on whichever label they re-encountered first. This strategy all ows children to make an informed choice between 2 apparently equally g ood labels, without straining their limited memory capacities.