O. Encinas et G. Daniel, DECAY CAPACITY OF DIFFERENT STRAINS OF THE BLUE STAIN FUNGUS LASIODIPLODIA-THEOBROMAE ON VARIOUS WOOD SPECIES, Material und Organismen, 30(4), 1996, pp. 239-258
Citations number
28
Categorie Soggetti
Biology Miscellaneous","Materials Science, Paper & Wood
Seven strains of the sapwood blue staining fungus Lasiodiplodia theobr
omae were studied in the laboratory for their ability to produce cell
wall degradation in three broadleaf wood species: Populus tremula, Hev
ea brasiliensis and Betula verrucosa and one conifer: Pinus caribaea v
ar. hondurensis. Degradation by the strains was determined using weigh
t loss in wood substance after 1 to 6 months and by optical and electr
on microscopy observations. All L. theobromae strains produce signific
ant weight losses and attack in all four wood species after 2 months.
Greatest losses often double that recorded for birch, were recorded in
rubber wood (ca 18 %) with strain WA1 previously isolated from Khaya
ivorensis and in aspen (ca 26 %) with strain IN1 previously isolated f
rom rubber wood. These greater weight losses were considered related t
o the presence of an easily degradable gelatinous (G-layer) layer in f
ibre cells which was rapidly utilized by L. theobromae. The pathway of
colonization typically began in vessels and parenchyma cells in the b
roadleaf species and resin canals and ray parenchyma cells in the coni
fer wood. Ray and terminal or apotracheal parenchyma cells were heavil
y colonized; the parenchyma cells were degraded after consumption of t
he G-layer in rubber and aspen wood fibres. Decay at a distance by fun
gal hyphae of early- and late-wood cells was observed with characteris
tic erosion and delamination of the S2 layer and destruction of the S1
-S2 and S1-middle lamellae interfaces. In spite of the apparent morpho
logical and physiological variability of the seven strains, L. theobro
mae behaved like a typical soft rot fungus producing TYPE 2 erosion ce
ll wall decay in the broadleaf wood species. Decay of Caribbean pine c
ells was limited primarily to erosion of non-lignified cells reflectin
g the known greater importance of lignin type (i.e. guaiacyl) and leve
l in hindering cellulolytic fungal attack.