In honor of the 100th anniversary of Sigmund Freud's original publicat
ion of his first psychoanalytic case study on hypnotic cure the author
examines the wide spectrum in Freud's clinical observation of what co
nstituted his patient's ''opposition''. The acknowledgement of this ''
opposition'' and the affect belonging to it, as well as of the resentm
ent active in the counter-transference, afforded them their proper exp
ression and provided therein the cure. The postulation of there being
opposition in the face of an existing volitional paralysis - the patie
nt could not breast-feed her child although she ''wanted'' to - led to
the discovery of the unconscious conflict. This was proof, however, t
hat the unconscious and its workings even existed in the first place.
The author delineates the clinical observations and arguments and then
reflects on what the treatment and the core interpretation would look
like today. Finally she takes a critical look at what today is a kind
of scepticism or defensiveness in matters concerning the unconscious.
This scepticism was already to be found in the husband as well as the
patient herself.