Mj. Pilat et al., DIFFERENTIAL INDUCTION OF PS2 AND CATHEPSIN-D MESSENGER-RNAS BY STRUCTURALLY ALTERED ESTROGENS, Biochemistry, 32(27), 1993, pp. 7009-7015
The influence of structural, alterations to the estradiol-17beta (E2)
molecule on the induction of pS2 and Cathepsin D (Cath D) mRNAs has be
en examined by Northern analysis of RNA extracted from MCF-7 cells. Ex
posure of cultures to estratriene did not affect the level of expressi
on of these estrogen-responsive genes. Addition of one hydroxyl group
to estratriene at either of the hydroxylated positions of E2 (3-phenol
ic or 17beta) yielded monohydroxyestrogens which stimulated the synthe
sis of Cath D and pS2 mRNAs to a level comparable to that induced by 1
0(-10) M E2 and displayed a decrease in activity at the higher concent
rations (10(-8)-10(-7)M) similar to that of the parent estrogen. Both
of these genes were induced maximally by estrogens with D-ring alterat
ions. Movement of the phenolic hydroxyl group of E2 to other positions
on the A-ring yielded ligands which were highly discriminatory in the
induction of these messages. 1-Hydroxyestratrien-17beta-ol was capabl
e of stimulating maximal synthesis of both pS2 and Cath D mRNAs when a
dded to cultures of MCF-7 cells at a concentration of 10(-8) M. Placem
ent of the phenolic hydroxyl at position 4 greatly diminished the indu
ction of these two estrogen-responsive genes. On the other hand, posit
ioning the A-ring hydroxyl group on carbon 2 yielded a ligand which br
ought about the induction of one gene (pS2) but was marginally effecti
ve in the induction of Cath D mRNA synthesis. 5alpha-Androstanediol an
d 5-androstenediol with a 17beta-hydroxyl group were capable of induci
ng both genes, provided the 3-hydroxyl group was in the beta-configura
tion. These results demonstrate that discrete changes in the structure
of estradiol generate ligands (2- or 4-hydroxyestratrien-17beta-ol) w
ith affinities for the estrogen receptor which are not related to thei
r capacity to regulate certain responsive genes (pS2 or Cath D). It is
proposed that the observed discrimination between these two responsiv
e genes is the result of variations in the receptor-analogue complex w
hich are important in interactions with gene regulatory factors (e.g.,
estrogen response element and/or transactivation function 2). Further
more, the spatial placement of the electronegative isopotential surrou
nding the aromatic A-ring of these estrogen analogues appears to be in
volved in the modulation of gene regulation.