Human anti-mouse antibodies (HAMA) methods were surveyed using a panel
of 17 serum and two plasma specimens which were circulated to ten lab
oratories for analysis. The panel included HAMA-negative and HAMA-posi
tive specimens (from patients given a variety of mouse monoclonal anti
bodies) and a specimen with a high rheumatoid factor titer. The partic
ipating laboratories used a diverse range of methods to determine HAMA
and all three of the commercially available quantitative methods for
HAMA were represented. The survey revealed significant differences in
HAMA results among the different laboratories.