Je. Tisdale et al., EFFICACY OF CLASS-1C ANTIARRHYTHMIC AGENTS IN PATIENTS WITH INDUCIBLEVENTRICULAR-TACHYCARDIA REFRACTORY TO THERAPY WITH CLASS-1A ANTIARRHYTHMIC DRUGS, Journal of clinical pharmacology, 33(7), 1993, pp. 623-630
The efficacy of class 1C antiarrhythmic agents was determined in 36 pa
tients with inducible sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia du
ring baseline electrophysiology study (EPS), who continued to have ind
ucible monomorphic ventricular tachycardia during EPS on class 1A anti
arrhythmic therapy. Of 12 patients who partially responded to class 1A
drugs, 11 (91.7%) continued to have a partial response during EPS on
class 1C therapy, whereas one patient did not respond. Of 24 nonrespon
ders to class IA therapy, 2 (8.3%) responded during EPS on class 1C th
erapy, 7 (29.2%) partially responded, and 15 (62.5%) did not respond.
In the 24 nonresponders to class 1A therapy, 9 of 17 patients (53%) wi
th left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) greater-than-or-equal-to 30
% responded or partially responded to class 1C therapy, compared with
none of 7 patients with EF < 30% (P < .05). The EPS on class 1C agents
in patients who fail to respond to class 1A therapy may be warranted
only in those with EF greater-than-or-equal-to 30%.