Applications of the new institutionalism to the study of public law ar
e often grounded in rational choice assumptions. This tends to reinfor
ce a view of law and legal rhetoric as merely instrumental tools that
foster certain institutional arrangements. This article proposes an al
ternative application of the new institutionalism that, the author arg
ues, offers an alternative vision of law and legal discourse which can
be used both to sustain and to critique the political order.