Ml. Hetland et al., RUNNING INDUCES MENSTRUAL DISTURBANCES BUT BONE MASS IS UNAFFECTED, EXCEPT IN AMENORRHEIC WOMEN, The American journal of medicine, 95(1), 1993, pp. 53-60
PURPOSE: To investigate the prevalence of exercise-related menstrual a
nd sex hormonal disturbances and the effect of exercise on bone mass a
nd metabolism in female runners at various training levels. SUBJECTS A
ND METHODS: Two hundred five premenopausal women (running 0 to 140 km
a week) were recruited from a large population of female runners who h
ad responded to a questionnaire regarding exercise habits. Maximum oxy
gen uptake was determined by treadmill testing. Gynecologic status was
assessed on entries in a menstrual calendar and by transvaginal ultra
sonography; sex hormonal status was measured three times with 10-day i
ntervals. Bone mass was measured in the lumbar spine, proximal femurs,
and total body by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry, and in the forear
m by single-photon absorptiometry. Bone turnover was assessed by measu
rement of plasma osteocalcin, serum alkaline phosphatase, and urinary
calcium and hydroxyproline. RESULTS: Sex hormonal disturbances were si
gnificantly related to training intensity. Compared with the normally
active women, the baseline levels and fluctuations of estradiol and pr
ogesterone in the elite runners were reduced by up to 25% to 44% (0.01
< p <0.05). The prevalence of amenorrhea increased from 1 % in the nor
mally active subjects to 11 % in the elite runners. No statistically s
ignificant relation was found between running activity and bone minera
l measurements or bone turnover. However, the group of amenorrheic run
ners had a 10% reduction in lumbar bone density as compared with the n
ormally menstruating runners (p <0.05), but the bone turnover was simi
lar. CONCLUSION: In the large majority of the female runners, no skele
tal affection was found despite significant sex hormonal and menstrual
disturbances. Only the runners with amenorrhea might be at increased
risk of osteoporosis.