M. Westman, IMPLICIT STRESS THEORY - AN EXPERIMENTAL EXAMINATION OF THE IMPACT OFRATERS STRESS ON PERFORMANCE-APPRAISAL, Journal of social behavior and personality, 11(4), 1996, pp. 753-766
We investigated the effects of manipulated stress and implicit stress
theory (IST) on performance appraisal. We conducted a 2 (stressed/nons
tressed participants) x 2 (high- and low-stress job of protagonists) e
xperimental design on a sample of 81 middle-level managers. Managers i
n the high-stress jobs were rated as more committed and more burned ou
t than managers in the low-stress jobs, as hypothesized. Interactive p
atterns demonstrated that stressed respondents evaluated the effective
ness of managers in the high-stress jobs as Cower than that of the man
agers in the low-stress job. Nonstressed respondents evaluated the eff
ectiveness of managers in the high-stress jobs as higher than that of
managers in the low-stress jobs. Negative affectivity had no impact on
reported stress and performance appraisal.