Films of pigeons flying to a perch were analysed to test a theory of h
ow speed of approach and timing of foot extension in preparation for l
anding are visually controlled. Rapid neural computation of distance t
o perch and of speed and deceleration would seem to be required. Howev
er, according to the theory, none of this is necessary. Simpler contro
l is possible based solely on the value of the tau function of certain
optic variables x, where the tau function of x is x divided by its ra
te of change; i.e. tau(x)=x/x. Tau(x) is a first-order approximation o
f time to contact with the perch and so could be used for timing foot
extension. Controlled braking is possible by simply keeping tau(x), th
e rate of change of tau(x), constant. The results indicated that pigeo
ns did regulate their braking when approaching the perch by keeping ta
u(x) constant and initiated foot extension when tau(x) reached a thres
hold value of approximately 150 ms. They followed this procedure even
when they had one eye covered, and so binocular vision was not necessa
ry for regulating braking or timing foot extension. It is shown that a
n optic variable that the pigeons could be using is the width of the o
ptic projection of the gap between foot and perch. It is further shown
that they could be using the same optic variable for controlling the
trajectory of their feet to contact the perch.