IMPACT OF INJECTION SITES FOR SOLUBLE INSULIN ON GLYCEMIC CONTROL IN TYPE-1 (INSULIN-DEPENDENT) DIABETIC-PATIENTS TREATED WITH A MULTIPLE INSULIN INJECTION REGIMEN
Je. Henriksen et al., IMPACT OF INJECTION SITES FOR SOLUBLE INSULIN ON GLYCEMIC CONTROL IN TYPE-1 (INSULIN-DEPENDENT) DIABETIC-PATIENTS TREATED WITH A MULTIPLE INSULIN INJECTION REGIMEN, Diabetologia, 36(8), 1993, pp. 752-758
Citations number
27
Categorie Soggetti
Endocrynology & Metabolism","Medicine, General & Internal
The absorption rate of rapid acting (soluble) insulin is slow from the
subcutaneous tissue of the thigh compared to intramuscular injection
into the thigh and s. c. injection into the abdominal wall. The aim of
the study was to evaluate the impact of soluble insulin injected eith
er intramuscularly into the thigh (IMT), s. c. into the abdominal wall
(SCA) or s.c. into the thigh (SCT) on glycaemic control in Type 1 (in
sulin-dependent) diabetic outpatients treated with the basal bolus ins
ulin delivery regimen. Fifty-five, C-peptide negative Type 1 diabetic
outpatients were included in a randomised 3-month intervention study.
The insulin doses were adjusted frequently by blinded observers based
on the patients' self-monitored blood glucose values and reported hypo
glycaemic episodes. The serum fructosamine value was within normal lim
its in three patients in the IMT group, in six patients in the SCA gro
up and in none of the patients in the SCT group following the interven
tion period (p < 0.01). However, the difference in mean serum fructosa
mine values did not reach statistical significance (IMT: 1.24 mmol/l (
95 % confidence interval; 1.17 to 1.31), SCA: 1.25 mmol/l (1.18 to 1.3
2), SCT. 1.34 mmol/l (1.26 to 1.41), (p = 0.09)). Blood glucose excurs
ions were larger in the SCT group than in the SCA and IMT group from p
ost-lunch to pre-dinner measurements and from pre- to post-dinner meas
urements. A higher number of measured low nocturnal blood glucose valu
es (less than 4 mmol/l) was observed in the SCT group (34 of 85) than
in the IMT (14 of 64) and SCA (21 of 81) group (p < 0.05). Three patie
nts in the IMT group, two in the SCA group, and seven in the SCT group
experienced severe hypoglycaemic episodes (p = 0. 14). In conclusion
s. c. injection of soluble insulin into the abdominal wall is preferab
le compared to s. c. injection into the thigh in the basal bolus insul
in delivery regimen. Furthermore, soluble insulin injection s. c. into
the thigh during daytime has important clinical implications for the
development of nocturnal hypoglycaemia independently of the NPH insuli
n injection at bedtime.