IMPACT OF INJECTION SITES FOR SOLUBLE INSULIN ON GLYCEMIC CONTROL IN TYPE-1 (INSULIN-DEPENDENT) DIABETIC-PATIENTS TREATED WITH A MULTIPLE INSULIN INJECTION REGIMEN

Citation
Je. Henriksen et al., IMPACT OF INJECTION SITES FOR SOLUBLE INSULIN ON GLYCEMIC CONTROL IN TYPE-1 (INSULIN-DEPENDENT) DIABETIC-PATIENTS TREATED WITH A MULTIPLE INSULIN INJECTION REGIMEN, Diabetologia, 36(8), 1993, pp. 752-758
Citations number
27
Categorie Soggetti
Endocrynology & Metabolism","Medicine, General & Internal
Journal title
ISSN journal
0012186X
Volume
36
Issue
8
Year of publication
1993
Pages
752 - 758
Database
ISI
SICI code
0012-186X(1993)36:8<752:IOISFS>2.0.ZU;2-J
Abstract
The absorption rate of rapid acting (soluble) insulin is slow from the subcutaneous tissue of the thigh compared to intramuscular injection into the thigh and s. c. injection into the abdominal wall. The aim of the study was to evaluate the impact of soluble insulin injected eith er intramuscularly into the thigh (IMT), s. c. into the abdominal wall (SCA) or s.c. into the thigh (SCT) on glycaemic control in Type 1 (in sulin-dependent) diabetic outpatients treated with the basal bolus ins ulin delivery regimen. Fifty-five, C-peptide negative Type 1 diabetic outpatients were included in a randomised 3-month intervention study. The insulin doses were adjusted frequently by blinded observers based on the patients' self-monitored blood glucose values and reported hypo glycaemic episodes. The serum fructosamine value was within normal lim its in three patients in the IMT group, in six patients in the SCA gro up and in none of the patients in the SCT group following the interven tion period (p < 0.01). However, the difference in mean serum fructosa mine values did not reach statistical significance (IMT: 1.24 mmol/l ( 95 % confidence interval; 1.17 to 1.31), SCA: 1.25 mmol/l (1.18 to 1.3 2), SCT. 1.34 mmol/l (1.26 to 1.41), (p = 0.09)). Blood glucose excurs ions were larger in the SCT group than in the SCA and IMT group from p ost-lunch to pre-dinner measurements and from pre- to post-dinner meas urements. A higher number of measured low nocturnal blood glucose valu es (less than 4 mmol/l) was observed in the SCT group (34 of 85) than in the IMT (14 of 64) and SCA (21 of 81) group (p < 0.05). Three patie nts in the IMT group, two in the SCA group, and seven in the SCT group experienced severe hypoglycaemic episodes (p = 0. 14). In conclusion s. c. injection of soluble insulin into the abdominal wall is preferab le compared to s. c. injection into the thigh in the basal bolus insul in delivery regimen. Furthermore, soluble insulin injection s. c. into the thigh during daytime has important clinical implications for the development of nocturnal hypoglycaemia independently of the NPH insuli n injection at bedtime.