AUTOMATIC POSTOPERATIVE MONITORING OF INFRAINGUINAL BYPASS PROCEDURES

Citation
J. Blebea et al., AUTOMATIC POSTOPERATIVE MONITORING OF INFRAINGUINAL BYPASS PROCEDURES, Archives of surgery, 132(3), 1997, pp. 286-291
Citations number
20
Categorie Soggetti
Surgery
Journal title
ISSN journal
00040010
Volume
132
Issue
3
Year of publication
1997
Pages
286 - 291
Database
ISI
SICI code
0004-0010(1997)132:3<286:APMOIB>2.0.ZU;2-Z
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the usefulness of a portable, computer-based, o scillometric, noninvasive blood pressure monitor for the automatic sur veillance of postoperative infrainguinal bypasses. Design: Prospective unblinded study. Setting: Regional tertiary care Veterans Affairs med ical center. Patients: A total of 60 limbs were examined in 3 groups ( n=20 in each group): normal, asymptomatic volunteers; older patients w ith symptomatic peripheral vascular disease; and patients who had unde rgone infrainguinal bypass procedures. Interventions: Noninvasive bloo d pressure monitor pressures, complete lower extremity arterial studie s with Doppler ankle-brachial index (ABI), segmental pressures, and pu lse volume recordings were performed in all groups. The patients who h ad undergone surgery also had hourly noninvasive blood pressure measur ements taken. Main Outcome Measures: Ankle-brachial indices obtained w ith the noninvasive blood pressure monitor were compared with simultan eous manual Doppler ABIs and pulse volume recordings. Results: There w as a significant overall correlation between the Doppler-derived ABIs and automatic oscillometric values (r=0.89, P<.001). Although there wa s a slight difference in absolute values (+/-SEM) (0.90+/-0.03 vs 0.84 +/-0.03, respectively), an excellent correlation was found between the 2 methods in the clinically relevant range of ABI values between 0.60 and 1.10. The oscillometric method, however, overestimated the ABI wh en it was less than 0.60 by the Doppler method (0.61+/-0.02 vs 0.44+/- 0.03, P<.001) and underestimated it when it was more than 1.10 (1.05+/ -0.02 vs 1.16+/-0.01, P<.001). (All values given as ?SEM.) Oscillometr ic overestimation correlated with depressed pulse volume recording wav eforms (P<.001) or diminished pulse volume recording amplitudes of les s than 10 mm (P<.001). Conclusion: The automatic oscillometric monitor provides a useful, accurate, objective, and quantitative method for p ostoperative bypass graft surveillance.