The author analyzes how the FDIC's capital directive procedures are pr
esently being implemented. He discusses the Fifth Circuit's decision i
n FDIC v. Bank of Coushatta, which held that the FDICs capital directi
ve procedures are constitutionally sound and not subject to judicial r
eview under the Administrative Procedure Act. The author argues that t
he capital directive procedures are not constitutionally, sound becaus
e they threaten a substantial property interest but afford no protecti
on against the potential bias of the decisionmaker.