In the absence of an adequate visual stimulus, accommodation adopts an
intermediate position of almost-equal-to 1 D. Since this position was
believed to reflect the level of tonic innervation to the ciliary mus
cle, this response has been termed tonic accommodation (TA). Part I of
this review will consider various aspects of this parameter, includin
g its reference to closed-loop accommodative function and autonomic ph
ysiology. In addition, both the methods of measurement and appropriate
terminology for this function will be discussed. It is concluded that
the response, which becomes apparent under so-called 'stimulus-free'
conditions, in fact probably represents an aggregate response resultin
g from multiple, non-optical stimuli. Thus the designation tonic accom
modation may not be appropriate, since it fails to describe accurately
the heterogeneous composition of the stimulus-free accommodative resp
onse. An associated paper (to be published as part II of this review)
will examine accommodative adaptation and both clinical aspects of TA
and adaptation of TA.