Em. Demiguel et al., COMPARATIVE-STUDY OF GALLOPAMIL VERSUS NIFEDIPINE IN PATIENTS WITH ISCHEMIC-HEART-DISEASE, International journal of cardiology, 40(2), 1993, pp. 127-133
In order to compare the anti-ischemic activity of gallopamil and nifed
ipine, a cross-over, double-blind, randomised trial was carried out in
30 male out-patients with a history of stable exertional angina, prov
en coronary disease and a positive stress test (ST-segment depression
greater-than-or-equal-to 1 mm). After a first 1-week wash-out period o
n placebo, the patients were randomised to gallopamil, 150 mg/day (50,
50 and 50) or nifedipine, 30 mg/day (10, 10 and 10) for 28 days. Afte
r a second 1-week wash-out period active treatments were crossed for a
nother 28 days. At the end of each drug or placebo period, a physical
examination, laboratory tests and a stress test were performed. Oral s
hort-acting nitrates were permitted throughout the trial periods. Twen
ty-one patients finished all periods of the study. Both drugs reduced
the maximum ST-segment depression during the exercise test: from 2.45
+/- 0.97 mm (placebo) to 1.95 +/- 0.82 mm (gallopamil, P < 0.05) and f
rom 2.50 +/- 0.93 mm (placebo) to 1.75 +/- 0.84 mm (nifedipine, P < 0.
05). Gallopamil but not nifedipine increased stress tolerance signific
antly: from 486 +/- 156 s (placebo) to 598 +/- 138 s (gallopamil, P <
0.05) and from 509 +/- 113 s (placebo) to 567 +/- 191 s (nifedipine, N
S). No significant differences were found between drugs. Both calcium
antagonists, gallopamil and nifedipine, showed similar efficacy in tre
ating myocardial ischemia.