As new archival evidence becomes available, so the history of the 1950
s is likely to be the subject of major revision. By reviewing existing
studies of one of this period's key features, notably the Land Husban
dry Act, this article suggests a number of ways in which the subject m
ight be opened up by future research. It argues that the actual impact
of the Land Husbandry Act may have been overestimated, at the same ti
me as the extent of differentiation among the peasantry was underestim
ated. Rural elites may well have survived the Act, in the process cruc
ially shaping opposition to it.