This paper argues that current research works on Chinese public admini
stration are atheoretical or pre-theoretical, that findings generated
could not serve as a basis for the development of a general (or medium
-range) theory of Chinese public administration or Chinese bureaucrati
c behavior, and that atheoretical or pre-theoretical research contribu
tes very little to advancement of usable knowledge for problem-solving
. The foci of the discussion in this paper are four major fallacies an
d problems, namely, over-simplification of causes, misformation of con
cept, stereotyping, and non-usable knowledge. It is concluded that Chi
na scholars should be more theoretically rigorous and work with their
counterparts in China in order to contribute to theory-building and pr
actical problem-solving.