LARGE-CELL LYMPHOMA - A STUDY OF PROGNOSTIC FACTORS AND ASSESSMENT OF5 RECENTLY PROPOSED PREDICTIVE SYSTEMS

Citation
A. Lopezguillermo et al., LARGE-CELL LYMPHOMA - A STUDY OF PROGNOSTIC FACTORS AND ASSESSMENT OF5 RECENTLY PROPOSED PREDICTIVE SYSTEMS, Leukemia & lymphoma, 10(1-2), 1993, pp. 101-109
Citations number
NO
Categorie Soggetti
Hematology
Journal title
ISSN journal
10428194
Volume
10
Issue
1-2
Year of publication
1993
Pages
101 - 109
Database
ISI
SICI code
1042-8194(1993)10:1-2<101:LL-ASO>2.0.ZU;2-U
Abstract
The main initial and evolutive variables of 133 patients with large-ce ll lymphoma treated with adriamycin-containing regimens were evaluated for prognostic significance. At the time of analysis, 66 patients had died with the median survival of the series being 48.9 months. Variab les associated with poor prognosis in the univariate study were: lymph oma of immunoblastic subtype, advanced Ann Arbor stage, presence of B- symptoms, poor performance status, bulky disease (greater-than-or-equa l-to 10 cm), involvement of two or more extranodal sites, bone marrow infiltration, and high serum LDH levels. In the multivariate analysis, Ann Arbor stage (p < 0.001), bulky disease (p = 0.004), performance s tatus (p = 0.018), and histologic subtype (p = 0.021) retained their p rognostic value. After excluding those patients with localized disease (stage 1), the Ann Arbor staging system lost prognostic significance in favor of bone marrow infiltration (p = 0.009) and serum LDH (p < 0. 001). However, when response to treatment was included in the regressi on model, it proved to be the most important prognostic factor (p < 0. 001), followed by serum LDH (p = 0.004). On the other hand, when the a nalysis was restricted to complete responders, serum LDH at diagnosis was the only parameter useful to predict survival (p = 0.008). Finally , five recently proposed prognostic classifications were useful to sep arate different risk-groups of patients when applied to the series.