INTRACOMPLEX ELECTRON-TRANSFER BETWEEN RUTHENIUM-65-CYTOCHROME-B5 ANDPOSITION-82 VARIANTS OF YEAST ISO-1-CYTOCHROME-C

Citation
A. Willie et al., INTRACOMPLEX ELECTRON-TRANSFER BETWEEN RUTHENIUM-65-CYTOCHROME-B5 ANDPOSITION-82 VARIANTS OF YEAST ISO-1-CYTOCHROME-C, Biochemistry, 32(29), 1993, pp. 7519-7525
Citations number
55
Categorie Soggetti
Biology
Journal title
ISSN journal
00062960
Volume
32
Issue
29
Year of publication
1993
Pages
7519 - 7525
Database
ISI
SICI code
0006-2960(1993)32:29<7519:IEBRA>2.0.ZU;2-7
Abstract
We tested the idea that the aromatic ring on the invariant residue Phe -82 in cytochrome c acts as an electron-transfer bridge between cytoch rome c and cytochrome b5. Ru-65-cyt b5 was prepared by labeling the si ngle sulfhydryl group on T65C cytochrome b5 with [4-(bromomethyl)-4-me thylbipyridine] [bis(bipyridine)] ruthenium2+ as previously described [Willie, A., Stayton, P. S., Sligar, S. G., Durham, B., & Millett, F. (1992) Biochemistry 31, 7237-7242]. Laser excitation of the complex fo rmed between Ru-65-cyt b5 and Saccharomyces cerevisiae iso-1-cytochrom e c at low ionic strength results in rapid electron transfer from the excited-state Ru(II) to the heme group of Ru-65-cyt b5 followed by bi phasic electron transfer to the heme group of cytochrome c with rate c onstants of (1.0 +/- 0.2) x 10(5) s-1 and (2.0 +/- 0.4) x 10(4) s-1. V ariants of iso-1-cytochrome c substituted at Phe-82 with Tyr, Gly, Leu , and Ile have fast-phase rate constants of 0.4, 1.9, 2.1, and 2.0 x 1 0(5) s-1 and slow-phase rate constants of 5.3, 3.5, 2.4, and 2.0 x 10( 3) s-1, respectively. Increasing the ionic strength to 50 mM results i n single-phase intracomplex electron transfer with rate constants of 3 .8, 3.1, 3.0, 5.0, and 4.5 x 10(4) s-1 for the wild-type, Tyr, Gly, Le u, and Ile variants, respectively. These results demonstrate that an a romatic side chain at residue 82 is not needed for rapid electron tran sfer with cytochrome b5. Furthermore, two conformational forms of the complex are present at low ionic strength with fast and slow electron- transfer rates. When the ionic strength is increased to 50 mM, interco nversion between the two forms of the complex becomes rapid, resulting in a single phase for electron transfer with a rate constant that is intermediate between the slow and fast rates. At still higher ionic st rength the complex dissociates, and second-order kinetics are observed .