CONTROLLING FOREST DAMAGE BY DISPERSIVE BEAVER POPULATIONS - CENTRALIZED OPTIMAL MANAGEMENT STRATEGY

Citation
Mg. Bhat et al., CONTROLLING FOREST DAMAGE BY DISPERSIVE BEAVER POPULATIONS - CENTRALIZED OPTIMAL MANAGEMENT STRATEGY, Ecological applications, 3(3), 1993, pp. 518-530
Citations number
20
Categorie Soggetti
Ecology
Journal title
ISSN journal
10510761
Volume
3
Issue
3
Year of publication
1993
Pages
518 - 530
Database
ISI
SICI code
1051-0761(1993)3:3<518:CFDBDB>2.0.ZU;2-R
Abstract
The beaver (Castor canadensis) population in the United States has cau sed severe damage to valuable timberland through dam-building and floo ding of bottomland forest. Traditionally, beavers have provided a sour ce of livelihood to a small group of people. However, recent low pelt prices have failed to stimulate adequate trapping pressure, and thus h ave resulted in increased beaver populations and damage losses. The lo w trapping pressure has left the burden of nuisance control on propert y owners. Since beaver populations are mobile, beaver extermination in controlled parcels results in beaver immigration from neighboring les s controlled parcels. Beaver migration from less controlled to control led parcels imposes an external cost (negative diffusion externality) on the owners of controlled parcels because they must incur the future cost of trapping immigrating beavers. Unless all land owners agree to control the beaver population simultaneously, the diffusion externali ty can decrease the incentive of individual landowners to control nuis ance beavers, thereby driving a wedge between social and private needs for such control. This study attempts to develop a bioeconomic model that incorporates dispersive population dynamics of beavers into the d esign of a cost-minimizing trapping strategy. Attention is focused on the situation where all landowners in a given habitat share a common i nterest in controlling beaver damages, and thus collectively agree to place the area-wide control decision in the hands of a public agency o n a cost-sharing basis. The public manager is assumed to minimize the present value of combined timber damage and trapping costs over a fini te period of time, subject to spatiotemporal dynamics of beaver popula tion. These dynamics are summarized by a parabolic diffusive Volterra- Lotka partial differential equation, and the population control proble m is cast in the framework of a distributed-parameter-control model. T he cost-minimizing area-wide trapping model accounts for net migration at each location and time, and characterizes the beaver-control strat egy that leaves sufficient beavers to strike an optimal balance betwee n timber damage and trapping costs. The marginality condition governin g this trade-off requires that avoided timber damage (measured as the imputed nuisance value, or ''shadow price,'' of the beaver stock in th e area) be balanced by trapping cost. The optimality system for this p roblem is solved numerically. The validity of the theoretical model is empirically examined using the bioeconomic data collected for the Wil dlife Management Regions of the New York State Department of Environme ntal Conservation. Empirical simulation generates discrete values for optimal beaver densities and trapping rates across all individual oper ational units over time. The optimal trapping program causes the initi ally uneven population distribution to eventually smooth out across th e habitat. The sensitivity analysis alternates trapping-cost and timbe r-damage parameters between high and low values. Increased trapping co sts decrease the level of trapping in the initial years of the optimal program, thereby leaving more beavers in the habitat. This triggers m ore intensive trapping during the later years of the program, requires more beavers to be trapped over the entire time horizon, and results in a higher overall program cost. Alternatively, increased timber-dama ge potential calls for increased trapping in the initial years of the program. Fewer beavers are maintained in the habitat and less trapping is required in the later years. Perhaps surprisingly, this results in a smaller number of beavers trapped over the entire time horizon.