The fatigue crack growth rate within epoxy/aluminum and epoxy/steel jo
ints was evaluated as a function of a) type of surface pretreatment, b
) water soak, c) fatigue cycle rate (Hz), d) adhesive thickness and e)
type of epoxy adhesive.For both adherends, aluminum and steel, a sign
ificant improvement in the fatigue behavior was obtained by use of a m
ercaptoester coupling agent. After an 8-day, 57-degrees-C water soak,
the metal surfaces which were pretreated with coupling agent (CA) or b
y phosphoric acid anodization (PAA) still resulted in cohesive failure
, while the controls had higher crack growth rate and showed greater s
catter. The room-temperature cure matrix with CA-treated aluminum show
ed a less dramatic improvement, probably because of a known difference
in the application procedure. For the steel joints and room-temperatu
re adhesive the improvement in the fatigue behavior of CA-treated samp
les was maintained after the 8-day hot water soak. No significant chan
ge was found in the fatigue crack growth rate over a frequency range o
f 1 to 5 Hz, but a significant change was found as a function of the b
ondline thickness. The room temperature curing adhesive evaluated here
in exhibited a much lower fatigue resistance than a heat-cured commerc
ial structural adhesive FM-73.