Vl. Tesh et al., COMPARISON OF THE RELATIVE TOXICITIES OF SHIGA-LIKE TOXINS TYPE-I ANDTYPE-II FOR MICE, Infection and immunity, 61(8), 1993, pp. 3392-3402
In earlier studies using a streptomycin-treated mouse model of infecti
on caused by enterobemorrhagic Escherichia coli (EHEC), animals fed Sh
iga-like toxin type II (SLT-II)-producing strains developed acute rena
l cortical necrosis and died, while mice fed Shiga-like toxin type I (
SLT-I)-producing clones did not die (E. A. Wadolkowski, L. M. Sung, J.
A. Burris, J. E. Samuel, and A. D. O'Brien, Infect. Immun. 58:3959-39
65, 1990). To examine the bases for the differences we noted between t
he two toxins in the murine infection model, we injected mice with pur
ified toxins and carried out histopathological examinations. Despite t
he genetic and structural similarities between the two toxins, SLT-II
had a 50% lethal dose (LD50) which was approximately 400 times lower t
han that of SLT-I when injected intravenously or intraperitoneally int
o mice. Histopathologic examination of toxin-injected mice revealed th
at detectable damage was limited to renal cortical tubule epithelial c
ells. Passive administration of anti-SLT-II antibodies protected mice
from SLT-II-mediated kidney damage and death. Immunofluorescence stain
ing of normal murine kidney sections incubated with purified SLT-I or
SLT-II demonstrated that both toxins bound to cortical tubule and medu
llary duct epithelial cells. Compared with SLT-I, SLT-II was more heat
and pH stable, suggesting that SLT-II is a relatively more stable mac
romolecule. Although both toxins bound to globotriaosylceramide, SLT-1
bound with a higher affinity in a solid-phase binding assay. Differen
ces in enzymatic activity between the two toxins were not detected. Th
ese data suggest that structural/functional differences between the tw
o toxins, possibly involving holotoxin stability and/or receptor affin
ity, may contribute to the differential LD50s in mice.