INFLUENCE OF DOSE-RATE AND DOSE PER FRACTION ON CLINICAL OUTCOME OF BREAST-CANCER TREATED BY EXTERNAL-BEAM IRRADIATION PLUS IR-192 IMPLANTS- ANALYSIS OF 289 CASES

Citation
Sm. Deore et al., INFLUENCE OF DOSE-RATE AND DOSE PER FRACTION ON CLINICAL OUTCOME OF BREAST-CANCER TREATED BY EXTERNAL-BEAM IRRADIATION PLUS IR-192 IMPLANTS- ANALYSIS OF 289 CASES, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, 26(4), 1993, pp. 601-606
Citations number
20
Categorie Soggetti
Oncology,"Radiology,Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging
ISSN journal
03603016
Volume
26
Issue
4
Year of publication
1993
Pages
601 - 606
Database
ISI
SICI code
0360-3016(1993)26:4<601:IODADP>2.0.ZU;2-1
Abstract
Purpose: To study the influence of Iridium 192 implant dose-rate and d ose per fraction of external irradiation on clinical outcome, the resu lts in 289 patients with early breast cancer were analyzed retrospecti vely. Methods and Materials: From 1980 to 1990, 118 T1 and 171 T2 lesi ons of breast were treated definitively by radiotherapy, following con servative surgery. External irradiation dose of 45 Gy was delivered ei ther with 2.5 Gy or 1.8 Gy per fraction to the entire target volume, p lus boost to the primary tumor. Boost dose of 15 to 30 Gy was given to the primary tumor either with iridium-192 implants or electrons. The implant dose-rate varied between 20 cGy/hr to 160 cGy/hr. Results: The minimum follow-up was of 12 months and maximum of 11 years (median: 5 6 months). Out of 273 tumors boosted with implants, the 270 patients w ere divided into five groups according to dose-rate as, groups 1 (20-2 9 cGy/hr, n = 17), group 2 (30-49 cGy/hr, n = 144), group 3 (50-69 cGy /hr, n = 69), group 4 (70-99 cGy/hr, n = 27) and group 5 (100-160 cGy/ hr, n = 13). The local failure rate was significantly increased in the group of patients treated with implant dose-rate < 30 cGy/hr (p < 0.0 5). While the incidence of late normal tissue complications and poor c osmetic outcome was significantly higher in the group of patients trea ted with implant dose-rate > 100 cGy/hr (p < 0.05). Conclusion: The pr esent analysis indicate that the implant dose-rate should be maintaine d between 30-70 cGy/hr to maximize local control and reduce the late n ormal tissue injury. Also the increase in dose per fraction of externa l irradiation while not influencing local control rate was crucial for incidence of late complications and cosmetic outcome.