Wl. Woolverton et Ja. English, EFFECTS OF SOME PHENYLETHYLAMINES IN RHESUS-MONKEYS TRAINED TO DISCRIMINATE (-AMPHETAMINE FROM SALINE()), Drug and alcohol dependence, 44(2-3), 1997, pp. 79-85
Although the structure-activity relationships (SAR) for the discrimina
tive stimulus (DS) effects of phenylethylamines (PEAs) have been exten
sively evaluated in rats, only isolated components of the SAR have bee
n studied in other species. Since DS effects in animals predict subjec
tive effects in humans, it is important to establish cross-species gen
erality of substitution results. In the present experiment, rhesus mon
keys (n = 4) were trained to discriminate (+)-amphetamine (0.56 or 1.0
mg/kg, i.g.) from saline in a two-lever drug discrimination paradigm.
Responding was maintained under a fixed-ratio discrete-trials schedul
e of shock avoidance. (+)-Amphetamine, (-)-amphetamine, and the N-subs
tituted phenylethylamines (+)-methylamphetamine, and (+)-ethylamphetam
ine all engendered dose-dependent, full substitution for (+)-amphetami
ne and had no effect on rate of responding. In contrast, the ring-subs
tituted compounds (+/-)-4-methoxyamphetamine (PMA), (+/-)-2,5-dimethox
y-4-methylamphetamine (DMA), (+/-)-2,5-dimethoxy-4-methylamphetamine (
DOM), and (+/-)-3,4,5-trimethoxyamphetamine (TMA) occasioned little or
no (+)-amphetamine-appropriate response up to doses of 3.0 or 10 mg/k
g. Therefore, it appears that monkeys respond to N-substituted ampheta
mines in the same way as rats, at least qualitatively. Considering tha
t ring-substituted compounds have been found to partially substitute f
or (+)-amphetamine in rats, it is possible that the (+)-amphetamine DS
may be pharmacologically more selective in monkeys. However, methodol
ogical differences may also explain differences between experiments. (
C) 1997 Elsevier Science Ireland Ltd.