T. Nederfors et C. Dahlof, A MODIFIED DEVICE FOR COLLECTION AND FLOW-RATE MEASUREMENT OF SUBMANDIBULAR-SUBLINGUAL SALIVA, Scandinavian Journal of Dental Research, 101(4), 1993, pp. 210-214
The aims of the present study were to measure stimulated submandibular
-sublingual (SM-SL) salivary flow rate with a modified Block-Brottman
collection device, and, further, to evaluate the reliability of measur
ements of stimulated SM-SL salivary flow rate by means of this modifie
d Block-Brottman device, as compared to measurements of parotid flow r
ate using modified Carlson-Crittenden cups. Twenty-nine healthy female
volunteers, aged 36 +/- 7 yr, were included. Saliva stimulation was a
chieved by application of a 3% citric acid solution to the rims of the
tongue four times/min, for 3 s every 15 s. On 3 consecutive days, sti
mulated parotid and SM-SL salivas were collected for 2 min at 07.30, b
efore breakfast (morning value), and at 10.00, 2 h after a standard br
eakfast (lunchtime values). SM-SL saliva was also collected on one occ
asion for 2 min x 3. For parotid and SM-SL saliva, the mean stimulated
flow rates were in the morning, 1.50 +/- 0.83 and 2.25 +/- 1.12 ml/mi
n, and at lunchtime, 1.71 +/- 1.16 and 2.54 +/- 1.01 ml/min, respectiv
ely. For both salivas, lunchtime values were significantly higher than
morning values by about 13-14%. Comparing parotid and SM-SL saliva fl
ow rates, we found the SM-SL saliva flow rate to exceed the parotid fl
ow rate by about 50% both in the morning and at lunchtime. Variations
in flow rate were analyzed by means of ANOVA. Interindividual variance
and variance between measurement days and times of day made up 88% of
parotid and 83% of SM-SL total variance. By calculating the variation
coefficient, we found this to be smaller for SM-SL salivary flow rate
measurements as compared to parotid flow rate measurements. In conclu
sion. the results of the present study indicate that our method of col
lecting stimulated submandibular-sublingual saliva by means of a modif
ied Block-Brottman collection device is as reliable as the method of c
ollecting stimulated parotid saliva by means of modified Carlson-Critt
enden cups, and is thus a useful method for future studies of changes
in submandibular-sublingual salivary production.