DIFFERENCES IN CLINICOPATHOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS AND MAJOR PROGNOSTIC FACTORS BETWEEN B-LYMPHOMA AND PERIPHERAL T-LYMPHOMA EXCLUDING ADULT T-CELL LEUKEMIA-LYMPHOMA
M. Shimoyama et al., DIFFERENCES IN CLINICOPATHOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS AND MAJOR PROGNOSTIC FACTORS BETWEEN B-LYMPHOMA AND PERIPHERAL T-LYMPHOMA EXCLUDING ADULT T-CELL LEUKEMIA-LYMPHOMA, Leukemia & lymphoma, 10(4-5), 1993, pp. 335-342
A total of 541 consecutive patients treated between 1975 and 1985, 449
with B-lymphoma and 92 with peripheral T-lymphoma, excluding adult T-
cell leukemia/lymphoma (ATL), termed peripheral non-ATL T-lymphoma, we
re analysed. Clinicopathological features that were predominantly asso
ciated with B-lymphoma were low and intermediate grades (defined by th
e Working Formulation), diffuse large cell type, stage II disease, bul
ky disease, favourable extranodal sites that are defined as a group of
primary tumors such as the eye, Waldeyer's ring, thyroid, and stomach
, while other features predominantly associated with peripheral non-AT
L T-lymphoma were high grade pathology, diffuse mixed-cell and immunob
lastic type, systemic ''B'' symptoms, poor performance status (PS), ge
neralized lymphadenopathy, involvement of organs such as liver, skin,
and nose, leucocytosis, and a high levels of serum alkaline phosphatas
e. The survival curve for B-lymphoma was better (P < 0.01) than that f
or peripheral non-ATL T-lymphoma. Multivariate analysis revealed that
the major prognostic factors were pathology, stage, and primary site f
or B-lymphoma, while stage, PS, and total protein levels were importan
t for peripheral non-ATL T-lymphoma. These results indicate that B- an
d peripheral non-ATL T-lymphomas appear to have different biological c
haracteristics.