Ca. Silagy et al., COMPARISON OF REPEATED MEASUREMENT OF AMBULATORY AND CLINIC BLOOD-PRESSURE READINGS IN ISOLATED SYSTOLIC HYPERTENSION, Clinical and experimental hypertension, 15(5), 1993, pp. 895-909
Citations number
12
Categorie Soggetti
Pharmacology & Pharmacy","Cardiac & Cardiovascular System
Repeated clinic blood pressure measurement was compared with noninvasi
ve ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in 10 elderly subjects with pe
rsistent isolated systolic hypertension and 11 normotensive controls.
Mean clinic blood pressures +/- Standard Deviation (SD), at visit 1 we
re 165/81 +/- 12/7 mmHg and 136/87 +/- 14/10 mmHg respectively. Subjec
ts were assessed on three subsequent occasions at weekly intervals. No
ne were receiving antihypertensive or vasoactive medication. Clinical
systolic and diastolic blood pressures were consistently higher than t
he corresponding mean daytime ambulatory blood pressures in both clini
cal groups at each of the visits. The difference was greater between t
he systolic pressures than between the diastolic pressures and these d
ifferences in systolic pressures were greater in the isolated systolic
hypertensives (26 +/- 5 mmHg) than in the normotensives (7 +/- 18 mmH
g). Daytime ambulatory readings aggregated from all four visits were n
ormally distributed for both blood pressure components in both clinica
l groups. In the isolated systolic hypertension group the clinic systo
lic and diastolic blood pressure measurements corresponded to the 93rd
and 85th percentiles of the ambulatory pressures respectively whereas
in the normotensives the equivalent percentiles were 69 and 78. These
results suggest a pressor response may largely account for the elevat
ed systolic blood pressure seen in elderly subjects with sustained iso
lated systolic hypertension based on clinic readings.