Cp. Tountas et al., A COMPARISON OF PERIPHERAL-NERVE REPAIR USING AN ABSORBABLE TUBULIZATION DEVICE AND CONVENTIONAL SUTURE IN PRIMATES, Journal of applied biomaterials, 4(3), 1993, pp. 261-268
Median nerve regeneration was studied in 30 adult primates after repai
r by microsurgical suture or tubulization with a nonwoven, bioabsorbab
le, polyglycolic acid device. The two methods were compared electrophy
siologically and histologically 6 and 12 months after repair. The elec
trophysiology included recording of electrically evoked compound actio
n potentials and subsequent determination of threshold, conduction vel
ocity, amplitude, and area above the baseline for each component. Meas
urements were obtained before nerve transection and at the time of bio
psy by stimulating both proximal and distal to the transection site. A
nalysis of all electrophysiological parameters revealed no statistical
ly significant differences (p < 0.05) between the two repair technique
s. Histopathology included examination of cross sections proximal and
distal to the repair sites and longitudinal sections through the coapt
ation site. End organs (Meissner's and Pacinian corpuscles and muscle)
were sectioned to determine the degree of reinnervation. No significa
nt differences between the repair techniques were observed by histolog
ical analysis of these sections. These evaluations indicated that the
tubulization repair technique produced results comparable to that of t
he suture technique. (C) 1993 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.