A brief history of the conflict over the initially voluntary and subse
quently mandated turtle excluder devices (TEDs) is given. Using survey
s, focused interviews, and documentary evidence, the major stakeholder
s in the marine environment are profiled. Analysis is focused on the w
ay each party to the environmental controversy over the protection of
sea turtles contributed to escalating the conflict. It is argued that
contenders for the resource became ''captured'' by the conflict in tha
t emphasis shifted away from protecting sea turtles to debating the ef
ficacy of TEDs and continuing the conflict became functional for stake
holders. The ''capturing '' process was not limited to user groups (sh
rimpers and environmentalists), but involved managers and scientists a
s well. Implications for the management process and the role of scienc
e are explored.