Ma. Croce et al., EMPIRIC MONOTHERAPY VERSUS COMBINATION THERAPY OF NOSOCOMIAL PNEUMONIA IN TRAUMA PATIENTS, The journal of trauma, injury, infection, and critical care, 35(2), 1993, pp. 303-311
Combination therapy for nosocomial pneumonia with a beta-lactam and am
inoglycoside is widely accepted because of synergy and reduction of re
sistant bacteria. This prospective study of 109 trauma patients (94 bl
unt, 15 penetrating) with nosocomial pneumonia was performed in consec
utive phases. In phase 1, patients were randomized to an anti-pseudomo
nal third-generation cephalosporin-cefoperazone or ceftazidime. Gentam
icin was added to each regimen in phase 2. The mean age of the patient
s was 37 years, the mean ISS was 31, and there were no differences amo
ng the four treatment groups relative to associated injuries. Patients
receiving monotherapy had a 56% cure rate compared with 31% for combi
nation therapy (p < 0.04). Persistence rates were similar in these two
groups (15% and 20%), but superinfection was significantly higher in
the combination group (49% vs. 28%; p < 0.04). The predominant superin
fecting organism was methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA
). Nine patients died (5% monotherapy, 10% combination), and eight had
a superinfection. We conclude that monotherapy had a higher cure rate
than combination therapy for empiric therapy of pneumonia in our trau
ma patients. Combination therapy failed because of superinfection (pri
marily MRSA). Emergence of MRSA may be from host overgrowth or plasmid
-mediated induction of resistance, possibly caused by gentamicin.