FINE-NEEDLE ASPIRATION BIOPSY OF PALPABLE BREAST-LESIONS - REVIEW ANDSTATISTICAL-ANALYSIS OF 1875 CASES

Citation
Sv. Nicosia et al., FINE-NEEDLE ASPIRATION BIOPSY OF PALPABLE BREAST-LESIONS - REVIEW ANDSTATISTICAL-ANALYSIS OF 1875 CASES, Surgical oncology, 2(3), 1993, pp. 145-160
Citations number
NO
Categorie Soggetti
Oncology,Surgery
Journal title
ISSN journal
09607404
Volume
2
Issue
3
Year of publication
1993
Pages
145 - 160
Database
ISI
SICI code
0960-7404(1993)2:3<145:FABOPB>2.0.ZU;2-H
Abstract
Fine needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) is an increasingly accepted metho d for investigating palpable breast nodules. We reviewed our experienc e with a consecutive series of 1875 FNABs performed using 21 or 23 gau ge butterfly needles. Correlation was made with histology (524 cases) or clinical follow-up (2-70 months). Cytological diagnoses utilized hi stopathological terminology and were categorized as: unsatisfactory (9 3 or 4.96%); no evidence of malignancy (1295 or 69.07%); atypical (183 or 9.76%); suspicious (42 or 2.24%); malignant (262 or 13.97%). Of th e 1571 benign aspirates, 220 or 14% were followed by excisional biopsy because of clinical suspicion, atypia or hypocellularity. Of these as pirates, 198 were benign while 22 proved to be malignant (one in situ ductal, one intracystic papillary, two tubular, one cribriform, seven ductal nos, three in situ and five infiltrating lobular carcinomas, tw o large cell lymphomas). Malignancy was detected histologically in 12. 9% of unsatisfactory, 3.06% of benign but often hypocellular, 8.16% of atypical, 97.62% of suspicious and 100% of malignant aspirates. Consi dering only histologically verified breast aspirates and including sus picious cytodiagnoses, FNAB had a sensitivity of 93.23%, a specificity of 99.50%, positive and negative predictive values of 99.62% and 90%, and an overall diagnostic accuracy of 95.61%. This series clearly sho ws that FNAB effectively evaluates palpable breast lesions when carefu l consideration is given to clinical judgement, specimen procurement, diagnostic criteria and a clinically relevant reporting style.