A. Macdonald et al., RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN INTRAABDOMINAL AND INTRARECTAL PRESSURE IN THE PROCTOMETROGRAM, British Journal of Surgery, 80(8), 1993, pp. 1070-1071
During normal defaecation the intrarectal pressure increases but, in t
he absence of a reference catheter in the pelvis, the contribution of
abdominal straining and rectal contraction to this rise is unclear. An
orectal manometry was performed in ten consecutive women with no gastr
ointestinal symptoms in an attempt to measure intrapelvic pressure usi
ng a catheter in the bladder. During filling the mean(s.e.m.) rectal p
ressure increased from 2(1) to 18(4) cmH2O. The mean(s.e.m.) intravesi
cal pressure remained unchanged at 2(1) cmH2O. Evacuation of the recta
l balloon produced an increase in mean(s.e.m.) intrarectal pressure fr
om 18(4) (end-filling pressure) to 68(15) cmH2O. The mean(s.e.m.) intr
avesical pressure increased from 2(l) to 51(18) cmH2O. The true intrar
ectal pressure (intrarectal minus intravesical) did not rise during de
faecation. The rise in intrarectal pressure during rectal evacuation o
ccurs by increased intrapelvic pressure alone.