A. Lajmanovich et al., CONSTITUTIVE EXPRESSION OF GM-CSF MESSENGER-RNA BY CML BLAST CELLS ISCORRELATED WITH ENDOGENOUS MEGAKARYOCYTIC COLONY FORMATION, Leukemia, 7(8), 1993, pp. 1211-1218
Purified blast cells from peripheral blood of 12 patients, with chroni
c myelogenous leukemia (CML) in chronic phase, were analyzed for the c
onstitutive expression of the granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulatin
g factor (GM-CSF) transcript. Seven out 12 patients exhibited the spec
ific 1.0 kb GM-CSF mRNA. Six from these patients presented an increase
d level of spontaneous megakaryocytic colony formation. Using an immun
ocytochemical procedure, the presence of GM-CSF was detected in a larg
e proportion (52% to 72%) of the blast cells of the three patients stu
died, who were selected for the high expression of GM-CSF mRNA transcr
ipts. Because the role of GM-CSF in the regulation of human megakaryoc
ytopoiesis is well documented, we investigated the inhibiting effect o
f anti-GM-CSF antibodies on the spontaneous megakaryocytic colony grow
th of three of the patients expressing the GM-CSF transcript. Addition
of anti-GM-CSF had a high neutralizing effect ranging from 60% to 70%
inhibition of endogenous megakaryocytic colony growth. As the GM-CSF
synthesis by leukemic cells is often induced by interleukin-1 (IL-1),
we also investigated the effect of anti-IL-1 antibody on the spontaneo
us megakaryocytic colony growth of the same three patients. No signifi
cant inhibiting effect was observed, showing that the role of GM-CSF i
n the spontaneous colony formation is not mediated by IL-1. In additio
n, patients who constitutively expressed the GM-CSF transcript and sho
wed endogenous megakaryocytic colony growth were those having a signif
icantly higher platelet count than the group of patients without GM-CS
F transcript and with no endogenous megakaryocytic colonies. In conclu
sion, these results suggest that GM-CSF, but not IL-1, participates in
the production of spontaneous megakaryocytic colony formation observe
d in some CML patients. The true autocrine or paracrine nature of this
stimulation remains to be established.