COMPARISONS OF THERAPEUTIC EFFECTS OF LEVODOPA, LEVODOPA AND SELEGILINE, AND BROMOCRIPTINE IN PATIENTS WITH EARLY, MILD PARKINSONS-DISEASE - 3-YEAR INTERIM-REPORT
Aj. Lees et al., COMPARISONS OF THERAPEUTIC EFFECTS OF LEVODOPA, LEVODOPA AND SELEGILINE, AND BROMOCRIPTINE IN PATIENTS WITH EARLY, MILD PARKINSONS-DISEASE - 3-YEAR INTERIM-REPORT, BMJ. British medical journal, 307(6902), 1993, pp. 469-472
Objective-To determine the optimum treatment for early Parkinson's dis
ease. Design-An open, long term, prospective randomised trial conducte
d by the Parkinson's Disease Research Group of the United Kingdom. Set
ting-93 hospitals throughout the United Kingdom. Subjects-782 patients
with early Parkinson's disease who were not receiving dopaminergic tr
eatment. Interventions-Patients allocated to treatment with levodopa/d
opa decarboxylase inhibitor alone (arm 1), levodopa/decarboxylase inhi
bitor/selegiline in combination (arm 2), or bromocriptine (arm 3). Mai
n outcome measures-Disability assessment as judged by improvement on H
oehn and Yahr, modified Webster, and North Western University disabili
ty scales. Adverse event profile and mortality ratios. Results-Interim
results indicate that all three treatment regimens led to improvement
in baseline disabilities after 12 months' treatment and that deterior
ation in control was apparent by three years. No significant differenc
es were found between the results of treatment in arm 1 and arm 2, but
both were significantly more effective than bromocriptine (arm 3) and
had fewer early adverse reactions. The adjusted difference (95% confi
dence interval) in Webster rating for arm 3 v 1 was 0.93 points (0.27
to 1.50; p=0.0058) and for arm 3 v 2 was 1,25 points (0.61 to 1.89; p=
0.0002). The incidence of dyskinesias and motor oscillations, however,
was significantly lower in arm 3 (2% and 5%, respectively) than in ar
m 1 (27% and 33%, respectively) and arm 2 (34% and 35%, respectively).
Conclusions-As there were no marked differences in functional improve
ment between the three groups the choice of treatment in the early sta
ges of Parkinson's disease may not be critical.