Sixteen subjects judged the accuracy of visual labels which identified
previously occurring olfactory or visual stimuli. Labels correctly id
entified the previous stimuli on 75 % of the trials (frequent conditio
n) and incorrectly identified the previous condition in 25 % of the tr
ials (rare condition). Event-related potentials were recorded from run
e scalp locations during the administration of the visual labels. As w
ould be expected, P300b was significantly larger during the rare non-m
atching trials, but was independent of the modality of the previous st
imulus. Previously occurring olfactory stimuli did, however, produce a
significant increase in negativity recorded over the left frontal lob
e during the visual label. The amplitude of this negativity was found
to be correlated with subjects' performance on the Connecticut Clinica
l Chemosensory Research Center test such that increased left frontal n
egativity predicted better olfactory performance. These data suggest t
he presence of a left frontal mechanism that is important for judging
the accuracy of labels for olfactory, but not necessarily visual, stim
uli.