A MULTIVARIATE APPROACH TO THE DESCRIPTION OF PATIENT POPULATIONS - AN EXAMPLE OF THE ANALYSIS OF THE HORMONE PROFILES OF PATIENTS WITH ADVANCED PROSTATE-CANCER
T. Ojasoo et al., A MULTIVARIATE APPROACH TO THE DESCRIPTION OF PATIENT POPULATIONS - AN EXAMPLE OF THE ANALYSIS OF THE HORMONE PROFILES OF PATIENTS WITH ADVANCED PROSTATE-CANCER, Journal of steroid biochemistry and molecular biology, 46(2), 1993, pp. 183-193
In view of the multifactorial nature of the endocrine dysfunctions tha
t may develop during prostate cancer and the unsuitability of the most
widely used statistical methods to study such dysfunction, we have in
the present study examined the relationships among 17 biological vari
ables in 26 patients with advanced prostate cancer by two complementar
y multivariate methods, correspondence factorial analysis (CFA) and a
hierarchical automatic classification procedure. The 17 variables incl
uded 14 hormones, their precursors or metabolites [LH, FSH, estradiol
(E2), testosterone, dihydrotestosterone (DHT), androstenedione (A), an
drostenediol (Ediol), dehydroepiandrosterone (DHA), DHA-sulphate (DS),
cortisol (CORT), 17alpha-hydroxyprogesterone (17-OH-PROG), pregnenolo
ne (PREG), 17alpha-hydroxy-pregnenolone (17-OH-PREG), and androstanedi
ol glucuronide (ADG)], one plasma binding protein, namely, sex-hormone
-binding protein (SHBG) and two tumour markers, prostatic acid phospha
tase (PAP) and prostate-specific antigen (PSA). The originality of the
se multivariate methods is that they do not preselect a dependent vari
able nor perform two-by-two correlations as in stepwise multiple regre
ssion analysis but describe the patient population by extracting layer
s of correlations (from strong to weak) from amid confounding variable
s. Compared to principal component analysis which is based on covarian
ce, CFA, based on the chi2-metric, enables the licit representation of
both tests and patients on the same factorial maps. From an examinati
on of proximity among variables, it is possible to deduce which tests
are related, which groups of patients have similar hormone profiles, a
nd which tests vary most in which patients. The most discriminant fact
ors in this particular population of patients were PSA and PAP levels,
which were, however, not strongly correlated and were apparently sele
ctively associated with certain hormones. PAP seemed the more patholog
ical marker; PSA was somewhat anticorrelated to the adrenal androgen (
DHA and DS) and PREG levels. The hormones with the lowest variance wer
e A, Ediol and CORT reflecting their key roles in metabolism. A number
of patients were hypogonadic. SHBG levels were not closely related to
total T levels but anticorrelated with ADG suggesting that, in the pa
tients concerned, SHBG decreases the bioavailable T fraction. There wa
s no correlation between ADG and precursor hormones (PREG, DHA, DS) bu
t a slight anticorrelation between these precursors and DHT. Therefore
the source of ADG in these patients does not seem to be increased lev
els of precursor hormones nor of DHT but increased peripheral tissue m
etabolism of androgens. In future, descriptive multivariate analyses o
f large patient cohorts should help to define subpopulations with dist
inctive hormone profiles for prospective clinical studies.