Although anticoagulation is the treatment most commonly chosen for pat
ients suffering from deep venous thrombosis (DVT), thrombolytic therap
y offers the promise of dissolving the thrombus within the deep venous
system, restoring patency and preserving valve function. If this is a
chieved, the incidence and severity of post-thrombotic syndrome can be
reduced. Data from 13 studies comparing anticoagulant therapy with th
rombolytic therapy for DVT in 591 patients have shown that, among thos
e treated with heparin, 4% had significant or complete lysis, 14% had
partial lysis and 82% failed to improve or worsened. Of those receivin
g lytic therapy, 45% had significant or complete lysis, 18% had partia
l lysis and 37% failed to improve or worsened. Long-term follow-up of
randomized patients has shown that those with successful lysis had a l
ower incidence of post-thrombotic syndrome and improved long-term veno
us function. The failure rate of systemic lytic therapy among patients
suffering iliofemoral venous thrombosis is high; therefore, catheter-
directed thrombolysis has been adopted with increasing success. Thromb
olytic therapy, delivered systemically using catheter-directed techniq
ues, should be considered as an important alternative in the treatment
of patients with DVT.