Performance evaluation of shipboard electronic systems entails debuggi
ng the systems in a laboratory environment, placing them in service an
d relving on svstem operators to provide feedback. General testing can
be performed at selected sites by system designers, but each site whe
re equipment is to be installed can offer unique problems. It is impos
sible to predict all the scenarios. Unique problems are more the rule
than the exception when equipment is destined for Navy ships. Ship dep
loyments make for difficult logistics when sending test teams to evalu
ate system failures. So, out of necessity, if newly installed equipmen
t receives the proper inputs and generates the proper outputs, it is a
ccepted and becomes the sailor's responsibilitv to maintain. In cases
where documentation is ambiguous or incomplete, it is left to the sail
or's ingenuity to continue testing and training on equipment. This is
generallv obtained through computer simulations and back-to-back testi
ng which can provide results for ideal conditions, but does not take t
he dynamics of interference into account. Remote site testing is the o
nly way to get a true representation of equipment performance and trai
ning problems. Electronic system operators on board Navy vessels are f
ortunate, thev have help. There exists an organization available near
major naval ports worldwide whose existence is to test electronic syst
ems performance. The testing utilizes electronic systems as they would
normally be configured for operations. This organization is the Shipb
oard Electronic Svstem Evaluation Facility (SESEF).