V. Schirrmacher et al., TUMOR-SPECIFIC CTL RESPONSE REQUIRING INTERACTIONS OF 4 DIFFERENT CELL-TYPES AND RECOGNITION OF MHC CLASS-I AND CLASS-II RESTRICTED TUMOR-ANTIGENS, Immunology and cell biology, 71, 1993, pp. 311-326
This study demonstrates that a syngeneic specific cytotoxic T lymphocy
te (CTL) response to a class I major histocompatibility complex (MHC)
positive tumour requires dual processing and recognition of tumour ant
igens. One type of antigen is processed and expressed in association w
ith class I MHC at the surface of intact tumour cells. It is recognize
d by CD8 alpha,beta TCR CTL in vitro and by protective immune T cells
in vivo and thus functions as a tumour-associated transplantation anti
gen (TATA). The other type of antigen is processed and expressed by di
stinct host APC in association with class 11 MHC. This is recognized b
y immune CD4 T cells which function as essential helper cells in the g
eneration of the CD8 CTL response. These conclusions are supported by
cell depletion and reconstitution experiments as well as by blocking e
xperiments with monoclonal antibodies using the highly metastatic clas
s II negative murine lymphoma ESb as a model system. The existence of
two types of cognate T cell responses in a syngeneic anti-tumour respo
nse was directly proved by the establishment of two types of tumour sp
ecific T cell lines which required as co-stimulator either MHC class I
I positive APC or IL-2. In suboptimal mixed lymphocyte tumour cell cul
tures either of these co-stimulator functions was found to be limiting
the overall anti-tumour CTL response. The generation of the tumour sp
ecific CTL response could be blocked by monoclonal antibodies against
all the molecules involved in the cognate interactions (i.e. class I M
HC, CD8, class II MHC, CD4 and TCR) but not by anti-CD2 or and-IgG. Th
e strict requirement for helper cells and APC could be bypassed by the
addition of recombinant IL-2 but optimal triggering of CD8 CTL-precur
sor required viable tumour stimulator cells. This well characterized i
n vitro assay may be useful (i) for monitoring the immune status of CD
4 and CD8 immune T cells separately, for instance of tumour bearing an
d/or treated animals and (ii) for the development and testing of poten
t tumour cell vaccines with T cell stimulatory and/or co-stimulatory a
ctivities.