Ea. Hooker, USE OF TYMPANIC THERMOMETERS TO SCREEN FOR FEVER IN PATIENTS IN A PEDIATRIC EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT, Southern medical journal, 86(8), 1993, pp. 855-858
The use of tympanic thermometers has markedly increased over the past
few years. While some authors have shown high correlation between rect
al and tympanic readings, others have found low correlation. After not
icing a failure of the tympanic thermometer to detect fever in obvious
ly febrile pediatric patients, we prospectively evaluated its use in o
ur emergency department. All patients less than 6 years of age who wer
e brought in for care over a 2-week period were eligible for entry int
o the study. Nurses were trained in the proper use of the instruments
before the study began. We used a calibrated tympanic thermometer (Fir
st Temp 2000A) and an electronic thermometer (IVAC 2080A). In all chil
dren the tympanic temperature was measured first, immediately followed
by measurement of the rectal temperature. The 39 children entered int
o the study ranged in age from 2 to 71 months (mean of 27 months). Rec
tal temperature ranged from 97.8-degrees to 105.2-degrees-F. The corre
lation between rectal and tympanic was low (r = .830) and was worse in
patients with fever (r = .612). The mean difference was 0.8-degrees-F
, but was as high as 3.4-degrees-F. The tympanic thermometer failed to
identify five of the 15 febrile patients (T greater-than-or-equal-to
100.5-degrees-F) in our study. We therefore conclude that the tympanic
thermometer is not sensitive enough to be used to screen for fever in
pediatric patients.