B. Fuller et al., CAN GOVERNMENT RAISE CHILD-CARE QUALITY - THE INFLUENCE OF FAMILY DEMAND, POVERTY, AND POLICY, Educational evaluation and policy analysis, 15(3), 1993, pp. 255-278
The quality of child-care centers and preschools-situated in a mixed m
arket-varies enormously. Advocates for higher quality urge higher subs
idies and stricter central regulation. Market advocates argue instead
that local demand and parental-choice remedies will spark quality gain
s while ensuring competitive prices. Federal and state governments hav
e responded with an array of policy interventions: targeting subsidies
on preschools serving low-income families; enacting statewide quality
standards; creating tax credits and vouchers for the ''working poor''
and middle-class families. This article assesses the influence of the
se alternative policies on preschool quality, based on a national surv
ey of 1, 805 centers in 36 states. Discrete policy effects are assesse
d after taking into account the influence of contextual sources of fam
ily demand: statewide levels of wealth, maternal employment, and pover
ty rates. Contrary to K-12 patterns, we find that center quality is hi
gher in centers receiving greater subsidies. However, the subsidy effe
ct depends on the particular indicator of quality being observed, effe
cts are also conditioned by state-level contexts. Statewide sources of
family demand, antecedent to policy interventions, help to raise cert
ain facets of preschool quality. Tax credits hold no discernible influ
ence on quality. Implications for building policy strategies in ''mana
ged choice'' school settings are discussed.