SONOGRAPHIC ESTIMATION OF FETAL WEIGHT BASED ON A MODEL OF FETAL VOLUME

Citation
Ca. Combs et al., SONOGRAPHIC ESTIMATION OF FETAL WEIGHT BASED ON A MODEL OF FETAL VOLUME, Obstetrics and gynecology, 82(3), 1993, pp. 365-370
Citations number
20
Categorie Soggetti
Obsetric & Gynecology
Journal title
ISSN journal
00297844
Volume
82
Issue
3
Year of publication
1993
Pages
365 - 370
Database
ISI
SICI code
0029-7844(1993)82:3<365:SEOFWB>2.0.ZU;2-J
Abstract
Objectives: To derive a formula for sonographic estimated fetal weight (EFW) based on a two-compartment model of fetal volume and to test it against two widely used formulas, especially at the extremes of fetal weight for which existing formulas are generally inaccurate. Methods: We analyzed 865 consecutive sonograms that met the following inclusio n criteria: singleton pregnancy, normal anatomy, delivery within 3 day s of sonography, and measurements of biparietal diameter (BPD), head c ircumference (HC), abdominal circumference (AC), and femur length (FL) . The weight of the fetal head was modeled to be proportional to HC3, and the weight of the trunk proportional to AC2 x FL. The proportional ity constants were found by multiple linear regression on 380 sonogram s performed in 1990 (the ''derivation set''). The new formula was test ed for accuracy of prediction of actual birth weight against the formu las of Hadlock et al and Shepard et al using 485 sonograms from 1991-1 992 (the ''validation set''). Results: In the derivation set, the form ula EFW = (0.23718 x AC2 x FL) + (0.03312 x HC3) was fit; the correlat ion with actual birth weight had an r value of 0.996. In the validatio n set, the new formula produced smaller systematic errors and smaller absolute errors than either the Hadlock or Shepard formula both overal l and in fetal weight strata from less than 1000 g to over 4000 g. Con clusion: The new formula makes geometric sense and provides accurate e stimates of fetal weight across a broad range of weights.