Sr. Inglis et al., THE USE OF VIBROACOUSTIC STIMULATION DURING THE ABNORMAL OR EQUIVOCALBIOPHYSICAL PROFILE, Obstetrics and gynecology, 82(3), 1993, pp. 371-374
Objective: To determine whether vibroacoustic stimulation during the b
iophysical profile can change the fetal behavioral state and thus impr
ove the score without increasing the false-negative rate of the test.
Methods: Eighty-one patients whose biophysical profile scores were 6 o
r lower after 15 minutes of observation had an electronic artificial l
arynx applied to the maternal abdomen in the region of the fetal head
for 3 seconds, followed by continued observation for fetal movement, t
one, and breathing for 15 minutes. We compared the obstetric and neona
tal outcomes of 41 patients whose biophysical profile scores improved
to normal after vibroacoustic stimulation with those of 283 patients w
hose scores were normal without vibroacoustic stimulation. Results: Vi
broacoustic stimulation did improve an abnormal or equivocal biophysic
al profile score to normal in 67 of 81 cases (82%). No antepartum stil
lbirths or perinatal deaths occurred. There was no increase in the obs
tetric and neonatal complication rates of cesarean delivery for fetal
distress, meconium staining of the amniotic fluid, and the incidence o
f small for gestational age infants. Conclusion: Vibroacoustic stimula
tion improved the biophysical profile scores in most cases, an effect
seen throughout the third trimester. Vibroacoustic stimulation did not
appear to increase the false-negative rate of the biophysical profile
and may reduce the incidence of unnecessary obstetric intervention.