Pd. Chumas et al., A COMPARISON OF THE PROTECTIVE EFFECT OF DEXAMETHASONE TO OTHER POTENTIAL PROPHYLACTIC AGENTS IN A NEONATAL RAT MODEL OF CEREBRAL HYPOXIA-ISCHEMIA, Journal of neurosurgery, 79(3), 1993, pp. 414-420
It has recently been reported that pretreatment with a single dose of
dexamethasone (0.1 mg/kg) 24 hours before hypoxia in 7-day-old rat pup
s is protective against an hypoxic-ischemic insult (unilateral carotid
artery occlusion followed by 3 hours of hypoxia in 8% O2). The author
s now examine whether pretreatment 6 hours before insult is equally ef
fective and compare other agents potentially suitable for prophylaxis
in neonatal hypoxia-ischemia, including the calcium antagonists flunar
izine (30 mg/kg pretreatment), nimodipine (0.5 mg/kg pretreatment), an
d the 21-aminosteroid U-74389F (10 mg/kg pre- and posttreatment). For
each active agent, there was also a vehicle-treated control group. Com
parison of the mean area of ipsilateral infarction on brain coronal se
ctions showed that there was no statistically significant difference b
etween the various control groups (mean area of infarction 66% +/- 4%)
. Pretreatment with dexamethasone 6 hours prior to hypoxia offered com
plete protection with no infarction. A beneficial effect was seen foll
owing pretreatment with flunarizine (mean area of infarction 33.6% +/-
7.8%), although this degree of damage was still significantly differe
nt from that seen with dexamethasone pretreatment. Pretreatment with n
imodipine or U-74389F offered no protection (mean area of infarction 7
7.5% +/- 4% and 59% +/- 10%, respectively). Unlike findings in adult a
nimals and clinical studies, the current studies show that dexamethaso
ne may have a role in the treatment of neonatal hypoxia-ischemia and d
eserves reappraisal.