Most international development agencies rely on the counterpart concep
t to achieve the transfer of knowledge between experts necessary to es
tablish, maintain, and expand development programs. Achievement of tha
t transfer of knowledge requires that those in the counterpart relatio
nship continually renegotiate their roles, relationships, statuses, an
d functions as the program is planned, implemented, and evaluated. Mos
t discussions of counterparts suggest that the transfer of knowledge i
s unilateral, i.e., from the foreign expert to the host country nation
al. The predominant Core Counterpart Model is a circumscribed one-on-o
ne relationship lasting the life of the project and confined to the le
vel of the bureaucratic hierarchy that houses it. This paper describes
four variations of the Core Model: 1) Multilateral Model; 2) Multilat
eral-Multilevel Model; 3) Team Model; and 4) Counterpart Development M
odel. The counterpart relationship is visualized as processual in natu
re across a spectrum of knowledge transfer. Each model is illustrated
by case examples from two programs to prepare college-level nurse-facu
lty in the People's Republic of China. The case examples demonstrate h
ow configurations of models can change over the life of the project wi
thout necessitating changes in counterparts.