The influence of Schumpeter's notion of ''creative destruction'' may h
ave led to an overemphasis on substitution between technologies in rec
ent models of endogenous innovation. Historical examples of technologi
cal change suggest that new technologies may just as frequently comple
ment older technologies, creating, rather than destroying, rents. Ackn
owledgment of the potential for both substitution and complementarity
among inventions allows for a much richer characterization of the grow
th process, creating the possibility of threshold effects and multiple
equilibria and bringing to the forefront the important role played by
the expectations of inventive entrepreneurs.