We tested the idea that ruminants allocate their feeding time to habit
at patches in relation to foraging efficiency. We used five tame red d
eer (Cervus elaphus) in an enclosure planted with four treatments of t
imothy grass (Phleum pratense) differing in their stage of growth. Old
er swards offered higher biomass but lower nutritional quality than yo
unger swards. We observed time spent feeding in each treatment during
each of seven trials. We measured goodness-of-fit between observed tim
es and predictions from two alternative hypotheses differing in optimi
zation strategy (maximizing versus matching), and a third, null hypoth
esis. We tested the hypotheses using two alternative currencies: diges
tible protein, and digestible dry matter or energy. Although digestibl
e protein concentration and dry-matter digestibility were highly corre
lated (r=0.763, P<0.001), the wider range of digestible protein made i
t the much more sensitive measure of forage quality. Distributions of
feeding time closely matched estimated intake rates of digestible prot
ein (R(Pred)2 d = 0.899) across all animals and trials. The other hypo
theses were rejected. The results have important ecological implicatio
ns in showing the underlying role of food in the selection of habitat
by ruminants, and that simple, mechanistic models of forage intake and
digestion can be scaled up to the level of animal behavioural choices
.