Vs. Gurfinkel et Ys. Levik, THE SUPPRESSION OF CERVICOOCULAR RESPONSE BY THE HAPTOKINETIC INFORMATION ABOUT THE CONTACT WITH A RIGID, IMMOBILE OBJECT, Experimental Brain Research, 95(2), 1993, pp. 359-364
Horizontal eye movements were recorded in eight healthy subjects durin
g super-slow trunk rotation with respect to the space-stationary head.
In some trials, subjects simultaneously indicated their perception of
self-motion by means of a joystick. Over the frequency range employed
(0.007-0.05 cycles per second, +/-20-degrees), all subjects perceived
the relative motion of head and trunk as a head rotation with respect
to the stationary trunk. Eye movements were observed which were in ph
ase with imaginary head rotation; their amplitude exceeded the amplitu
de of actual body rotation. The grasping of a rigid ground-based handl
e (1) produced a sensation of trunk rotation in space, (2) suppressed
the sensation of imaginary head rotation in space and (3) gave rise to
a significant decrease in amplitude of eye movements. The grasping of
a stiff rod with non-zero compliance did not produce these effects. I
t is concluded that eye movements in response to body rotation with re
spect to the fixed head are not purely reflex reactions, but are influ
enced by the internal representation of body motion.